Skip to main content

Are you ready for a challenge?

We’re excited to launch this Agentic Quest Challenge, designed to push the boundaries of automation with Agentic Process Automation concepts. This challenge invites you to build an automation solution that helps TrustShield Insurance process Requests for Quotes (RFQs) from independent agents faster and more efficiently. With the pressure to reduce response times and win more high-value insurance policies, your innovative automation can make a real impact on their business goals. 

If you’re new to AI Skills or Process Composer, this is a great opportunity to dive in and explore how these tools can transform unstructured data into actionable workflows. (If you already signed up for APA Training Camp, you can use the same credentials to participate in the challenge! If you didn't sign up for training camp, what are you waiting for?! Sign up now, learn new things, and gain the skills you'll need to complete the challenge, plus free access to our control room.)

Now, let’s meet your new boss from TrustShield Insurance.
 

 

Challenge Objective 

TrustShield Insurance partners with independent agents who submit quote requests for various insurance types—auto, home, life, and business. These agents shop around and select the provider who replies the fastest. To meet their growth targets, TrustShield aims to reduce response times for high-value policies by automating the intake and processing of RFQs. 

Your mission is to build an automation that fetches the unread RFQs from an email inbox, extracts key data points using AI Skills you create, and submits them in the correct order into the QuoteMaster Priority Engine (which can be found in the middle of this webpage).
 

Rules

  • The incoming RFQs arrive in non-standardized formats via email. 
  • You must design new AI Skills to interpret the unstructured data. 
  • Integrate with existing JavaScript tools and a Python model.
  • Use Process Composer to orchestrate the process from data extraction to submission. 
  • Process the 3 unread RFQs.
  • Ensure the RFQs are inputted into QuoteMaster in the correct priority order.
  • Sharing Your Results in the Insurance RFQ Challenge Page 


Once you’ve completed the challenge, share a screenshot of your solution on social media with the hashtag #AgenticQuest and tag 3 Automation developers you want to challenge next. We’ll be watching for posts to reward standout participants with exclusive swag! Be sure to register for the Agentic Quest Challenge to qualify for prizes

You can also download a certificate of completion to share on your socials after solving the challenge! 

Are you ready to get started? 


Go be great.

Mission Accomplished!

 


 


 

@Marc Mueller congratulations!


 


 

@SamthoshYellishetty Congts 🥰


Hello Everyone,

With respect agentic quest challenge: Insurance RFQ Challenge.

After several retries and attempts for RFQ-2024-007,
the estimated profitability rate value is getting as 18.36% if we consider 
1. Duration as 4 months.
2. ⁠Coverage Amount as $731860
3. ⁠ Margin as 0.6
4. ⁠flat cost as $12000

For RFQ-2024-007 Estimated Profitability Rate:

Calculations:

Gross Revenue = (Coverage Amount × Margin) × Duration
= ($731,860 × 0.6) × (4/12)
= $146,372

Net Profit = Gross Revenue − Flat Cost
= $146,372 − $12,000
= $134,372

Profitability Rate = (Net Profit / Policy Amount) × 100%
= ($134,372 / $731,860) × 100%
= 18.36 or (18.4)


Any of these values are not taken for consideration and throwing error. But for other 4 emails we are getting 100% accuracy with any combination.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values?


 


Challenge completed 🚀


Hello Everyone,

With respect agentic quest challenge: Insurance RFQ Challenge.

After several retries and attempts for RFQ-2024-007,
the estimated profitability rate value is getting as 18.36% if we consider 
1. Duration as 4 months.
2. ⁠Coverage Amount as $731860
3. ⁠ Margin as 0.6
4. ⁠flat cost as $12000

For RFQ-2024-007 Estimated Profitability Rate:

Calculations:

Gross Revenue = (Coverage Amount × Margin) × Duration
= ($731,860 × 0.6) × (4/12)
= $146,372

Net Profit = Gross Revenue − Flat Cost
= $146,372 − $12,000
= $134,372

Profitability Rate = (Net Profit / Policy Amount) × 100%
= ($134,372 / $731,860) × 100%
= 18.36 or (18.4)


Any of these values are not taken for consideration and throwing error. But for other 4 emails we are getting 100% accuracy with any combination.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values?

Thanks for your comment on this. I'm having the same problem, but I don't know exactly what's causing it.

I spent the entire weekend trying to solve the issue, and I'm seriously starting to think it's a problem with the website itself.

Sometimes I get 23 out of 27 correct, other times 21 out of 27, and sometimes 25 out of 27. I've intentionally entered incorrect data in some fields, and it doesn't mark them as wrong. For example, if I intentionally change 3 fields with false data, and I usually get 23 correct, I then get 21 correct. There should be 3 fewer correct.

I really don't know if there's a formatting issue I'm overlooking or if it's another problem entirely.

Regarding your calculations, in my case, it comes out to 18.16 if we consider the 4 months as 0.33. If you consider the 4 months as 0.333333333, the result is what you indicated. It all depends on how we calculate the duration.


Hello Everyone,

With respect agentic quest challenge: Insurance RFQ Challenge.

After several retries and attempts for RFQ-2024-007,
the estimated profitability rate value is getting as 18.36% if we consider 
1. Duration as 4 months.
2. ⁠Coverage Amount as $731860
3. ⁠ Margin as 0.6
4. ⁠flat cost as $12000

For RFQ-2024-007 Estimated Profitability Rate:

Calculations:

Gross Revenue = (Coverage Amount × Margin) × Duration
= ($731,860 × 0.6) × (4/12)
= $146,372

Net Profit = Gross Revenue − Flat Cost
= $146,372 − $12,000
= $134,372

Profitability Rate = (Net Profit / Policy Amount) × 100%
= ($134,372 / $731,860) × 100%
= 18.36 or (18.4)


Any of these values are not taken for consideration and throwing error. But for other 4 emails we are getting 100% accuracy with any combination.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values?

@MAIYA_0 ​@leandro.castello 

 

Without giving too much away, just give it another run and it’ll work fine.


Hello Everyone,

With respect agentic quest challenge: Insurance RFQ Challenge.

After several retries and attempts for RFQ-2024-007,
the estimated profitability rate value is getting as 18.36% if we consider 
1. Duration as 4 months.
2. ⁠Coverage Amount as $731860
3. ⁠ Margin as 0.6
4. ⁠flat cost as $12000

For RFQ-2024-007 Estimated Profitability Rate:

Calculations:

Gross Revenue = (Coverage Amount × Margin) × Duration
= ($731,860 × 0.6) × (4/12)
= $146,372

Net Profit = Gross Revenue − Flat Cost
= $146,372 − $12,000
= $134,372

Profitability Rate = (Net Profit / Policy Amount) × 100%
= ($134,372 / $731,860) × 100%
= 18.36 or (18.4)


Any of these values are not taken for consideration and throwing error. But for other 4 emails we are getting 100% accuracy with any combination.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values?

@MAIYA_0 ​@leandro.castello 

 

Without giving too much away, just give it another run and it’ll work fine.

Hi, thanks for replying!
@MAIYA_0 Did you try with 18.16?

 

 

 

Hello Everyone,

With respect agentic quest challenge: Insurance RFQ Challenge.

After several retries and attempts for RFQ-2024-007,
the estimated profitability rate value is getting as 18.36% if we consider 
1. Duration as 4 months.
2. ⁠Coverage Amount as $731860
3. ⁠ Margin as 0.6
4. ⁠flat cost as $12000

For RFQ-2024-007 Estimated Profitability Rate:

Calculations:

Gross Revenue = (Coverage Amount × Margin) × Duration
= ($731,860 × 0.6) × (4/12)
= $146,372

Net Profit = Gross Revenue − Flat Cost
= $146,372 − $12,000
= $134,372

Profitability Rate = (Net Profit / Policy Amount) × 100%
= ($134,372 / $731,860) × 100%
= 18.36 or (18.4)


Any of these values are not taken for consideration and throwing error. But for other 4 emails we are getting 100% accuracy with any combination.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values?

@MAIYA_0 ​@leandro.castello 

 

Without giving too much away, just give it another run and it’ll work fine.

@Matt.Stewart   I tried so many times from last  week, still i am getting same error and few other who also completed this challenge also facing the same error for RFQ 007.

Is there any miss or error in my calculations or consideration of values for RFQ 007?

 

 


007 had an issue that was corrected over the weekend.  If you try today, you can validate your code and logic are working.


007 had an issue that was corrected over the weekend.  If you try today, you can validate your code and logic are working.

@Matt.Stewart Yes, its working fine now.

When i tested today morning (ISTime) it failed, So i questioned once again.


Finally challenge completed !!✅


Finally challenge completed !!✅

which part didya find the hardest actually I’ve been trying for two days now I'm either getting 85% or 77% I'm not able to understand where i went wrong..


Finally challenge completed !!✅

which part didya find the hardest actually I’ve been trying for two days now I'm either getting 85% or 77% I'm not able to understand where i went wrong..

You're probably stuck on the same thing that happened to me.

Check the profit value; it shouldn't have any 0s at the end. For example:

  • If the profit is 13.78, that's fine, you should insert that value.
  • If it's 13.50, you should insert 13.5.
  • If it's 13.00, you should insert 13.

Finally challenge completed !!✅

which part didya find the hardest actually I’ve been trying for two days now I'm either getting 85% or 77% I'm not able to understand where i went wrong..

You're probably stuck on the same thing that happened to me.

Check the profit value; it shouldn't have any 0s at the end. For example:

  • If the profit is 13.78, that's fine, you should insert that value.
  • If it's 13.50, you should insert 13.5.
  • If it's 13.00, you should insert 13.

That was one of the issues thank you, Still I'm getting a constant Accuracy of 81% now! I can share the responses I got before entering the data in to the page

1]

2]

3] 

 


Hi ​@jshaji,

let me check mine...

005:

I have 2 months for start_date

 

Did you check this too? should be 3 / 3
 

 

Cheers

Marc


Hi ​@jshaji,

let me check mine...

 

Cheers

Marc

Thanks ​@Marc Mueller 


Hi ​@jshaji,

let me check mine...

 

Cheers

Marc

Thanks ​@Marc Mueller 

Thanks ​@Marc Mueller , I thought so it’ll be start date


@jshaji 

 

Hi ​@jshaji,

let me check mine...

005:

I have 2 months for start_date

 

Did you check this too? should be 3 / 3
 

 

Cheers

Marc

 


@jshaji 

 

Hi ​@jshaji,

let me check mine...

005:

I have 2 months for start_date

 

Did you check this too? should be 3 / 3
 

@Marc Mueller Yup, that is Done, the Accuracy is shown, but it’s 81.55% not budging!

Cheers

Marc

 

 


@jshaji I have different “StrategicAlignment” too 🙈

 

005:

"StrategicAlignment": "Low"

 

009:

"StrategicAlignment": "Low"


@jshaji I have different “StrategicAlignment” too 🙈

 

005:

"StrategicAlignment": "Low"

 

009:

"StrategicAlignment": "Low"

@Marc Mueller I think maybe that’s the issue i might need to tweak the prompt ! Thanks !


Reply